X Pulls the Plug — the Era of “Talking Your Way to Traffic” Comes to an End.
Source: TechFlow (Shenchao)
X has shut down “tweet-to-earn.”
Yesterday, X’s Head of Product Nikita Bier announced that any application that rewards users for posting will have its API access revoked.
He added—almost considerately—that affected developers are welcome to contact the team, and X will help them migrate to Threads or Bluesky.
“The landlord kicks you out—and even helps arrange the moving truck.”
As soon as the news broke, the InfoFi sector collapsed across the board. KAITO fell by 20%, Cookie dropped by 20%, and the Kaito Yappers community, with 157,000 members, was shut down entirely.
Less than an hour later, Kaito founder Yu Hu published a long-form statement.
The post contained no apology to the community and no protest against X’s policy change. Its core message was straightforward:
Move elsewhere.

Yaps is being discontinued. The new product is called Kaito Studio, which will follow a more traditional marketing model—one-to-one partnerships between brands and creators—moving away from the open, points-farming system where anyone could participate.
Twitter is no longer the priority. The focus will shift to YouTube and TikTok.
The crypto niche is no longer the sole target either; the expansion is toward finance, AI, and the broader creator economy—a market worth USD 200 billion.
The product is ready.
The direction is clear.
The data is in place.
And a new narrative has been formed.
Still, this does not feel like an emergency response written within an hour. It feels more like something prepared in advance—kept in a drawer, waiting for X to make the first move.
At the same time, there were earlier signals on-chain.
Kaito’s multisig contract previously distributed 24 million KAITO tokens to five addresses. One of those addresses transferred 5 million KAITO in full to Binance a week ago.
It looks far more like a cash-out at the right moment.

Advance communication.
Advance drafting.
Advance transfer of tokens to exchanges.
Everything that needed to be done was done.
Then, once X made the announcement, the long statement followed immediately—polished, composed, framed as a proactive pivot and an embrace of change.
In the statement, Yu Hu wrote:
“After discussions with X, both parties agreed that a fully permissionless distribution system is no longer viable.”
Agreed.
Being kicked out is reframed as “reaching consensus.”
A product being effectively terminated is repackaged as a strategic upgrade.
This kind of rhetoric is all too familiar in crypto.
Projects never say, “We failed.”
They say they are exploring new possibilities.
They say market conditions have changed.
They say this is a planned transition.
It sounds graceful—but it is also pure PR.
At its core, X’s ban was merely the final blow. The “tweet-to-earn” model was already on its way out.
Mining by posting sounds appealing: tokenizing attention, fairly compensating creators, building a decentralized information economy.
But once deployed in reality, everyone knows how it played out.
If rewards are tied to posting, people post more.
If AI can generate content at scale, AI does the posting.
If accounts are unlimited, people spin up endless alts.
According to CryptoQuant, on January 9 alone, bots generated 7.75 million crypto-related tweets on X, a year-over-year increase of 1,224%.
ZachXBT had already been criticizing this last year, calling InfoFi platforms the primary drivers of AI-generated spam. He even offered a USD 5,000 bounty for user data to identify bot networks.
Genuine discussion was drowned out by endless “GM,” “LFG,” and “bullish.” Humans and bots blended together to the point where telling them apart became nearly impossible.
X’s Head of Product, Nikita Bier, had already posted a warning last week:
“CT is dying from suicide, not from the algorithm.”
Crypto Twitter is killing itself—it isn’t being killed by the algorithm.
At the time, the crypto community mocked him for arrogance and responded with GM memes.
Looking back now, doesn’t it feel like a notice issued before an execution?
Addressing spam, Yu Hu said Kaito had tried everything: raising thresholds, adding filters, redesigning incentives.
None of it worked.
The moment you reward posting with tokens, you are effectively offering a bounty for noise. No threshold can outpace profit-driven behavior. Human incentives are straightforward: as long as rewards exist, spam will not stop.
More critically, the lifeline was never in their own hands.
What business was Kaito really in?
Leveraging X’s traffic, using tokens to incentivize content production, and selling the resulting data to projects for marketing.
X was the foundation. Kaito was the structure built on top.
The moment the owner of the foundation decides to reclaim it, the building collapses. No justification required. No negotiation needed. A single announcement is enough.
InfoFi claims to be about a decentralized attention economy. But the attention layer was never decentralized. The algorithm belongs to the platform. The API belongs to the platform. The users belong to the platform.
You can put points on-chain.
You can decentralize the token.
But you cannot decentralize Twitter.
A parasite attempting to overthrow its host does not trigger a revolution. The host simply pulls the plug.
Over the past few years, Web3 startups have repeatedly pursued this model: borrow Web2 traffic to build Web3 momentum. Users remain on Twitter. Data remains on Twitter. Attention remains on Twitter. But the token is self-issued, and the revenue flows inward.
It sounds clever—using leverage to achieve scale.
But someone else’s traffic will always belong to someone else. Platforms tolerate you only until you become inconvenient. Once you do, parasitic business models collapse instantly.
This should serve as a warning to every Web3 project built on borrowed platform traffic.
If your lifeline is controlled by someone else, then every dollar you earn exists only because it hasn’t yet been taken back.
Ask yourself whether you are building a company—or renting a room.
Renters should not think like landlords, and they certainly should not believe the house is theirs.
Kaito says it will move to YouTube and TikTok next.
But are those landlords really easier to negotiate with than Musk?
You may also like

Morning Report | Drift receives support from Tether and others to establish a $147.5 million recovery fund; Charles Schwab launches spot cryptocurrency trading services; Morgan Stanley lists asset tokenization as a growth priority

Beta, meet cash flow

How do tokenized stocks work? A conversation with the head of digital assets at BlackRock

Is the rebound an illusion? The bond market has already provided the answer

The End of Crypto Premium? Observing the Market Logic Shift from the Dilemma After Gemini's Listing

The third round of repurchase and destruction by JST has been completed as scheduled, with a repurchase and destruction scale exceeding 21 million USD

Will Bitcoin ETF Increase Bitcoin Price in 2026?
Will Bitcoin ETF increase BTC price in 2026? See what ETF inflows signal about institutional demand, market momentum, and Bitcoin’s long-term outlook.

How to Track Bitcoin ETF Flows in 2026: Best Free Trackers Used by Analysts
Since 2024, Bitcoin ETFs have become one of the main channels through which institutional capital enters the crypto market. Unlike traditional crypto exchange volume data, ETF flow data reflects portfolio allocation decisions from large investors, which often influence long-term price direction rather than short-term speculation.

How to Invest in Bitcoin ETF in 2026: Beginner's Step-by-Step Guide
For users who want the simplest way to follow Bitcoin price movements, ETFs can be a convenient starting point.

What Is a Bitcoin ETF? Is Bitcoin ETF a Good Investment Entry for Crypto Beginners in 2026?
What is a Bitcoin ETF and why does it matter in 2026? Learn how Bitcoin ETFs work, why institutions use them, and how they changed crypto market access worldwide.

Bitcoin ETF vs Ethereum ETF: What's the Difference in 2026?
Bitcoin ETF vs Ethereum ETF: What’s the difference and which should you choose in 2026? Compare risk, adoption trends, and portfolio roles before investing.

The Bounce is a Illusion? The Bond Market Has Answered

The Flip Side of the Stock Market Rally: Energy Reconfiguration, Bitcoin Short Squeeze, and Market Dislocation

Claude's Request for Identity Verification Prompts Reflection from a Relay Operator

PinPet × VELA: Solana's First Atomic Swap Engine and Yield Hedging Protocol, Reframing the DeFi Financial Paradigm

From Coinbase to OpenAI: When lobbying experts start to flee crypto

Understanding the Key Issues of Tokenization in One Article





