The DeFi lending protocol Drift was hacked for over $200 million in just 10 seconds, affecting more than 15 projects
Author: Gu Yu, ChainCatcher
Around 1 AM today, a massive theft incident occurred again in the DeFi space, where the Solana lending protocol Drift was attacked by hackers, resulting in over $220 million in user assets being stolen within ten seconds.
After the incident, the Drift token dropped over 40% in a short time, with the current FDV around $44 million. Due to the involvement of many assets in the Solana ecosystem, tokens in the Solana space such as SOL and JUP experienced varying degrees of abnormal declines.
Previously, Drift was one of the largest lending protocols in the Solana ecosystem. According to RootData, the protocol has raised over $52 million, with investors including top VCs like Multicoin Capital, Polychain, Robot Ventures, Blockchain Capital, Ethereal Ventures, and Jump Capital.
According to public analysis, this theft of Drift is closely related to the illegal acquisition of control over the multi-signature address, combined with common attack methods such as governance attacks and oracle attacks. The attacker used a single signature key to complete all operations in one transaction: creating a fake market, manipulating the oracle, and lifting withdrawal restrictions. Among them, the possibility of insider involvement in the leakage of the multi-signature address private key exists.
The frequently seen attack methods, along with the project's weak preventive measures, once again expose the vulnerabilities in the DeFi space. Based on a tweet and related interpretations from Chaos Labs founder Omer Goldberg, here is a detailed analysis of the theft process:
The initial signs of the incident occurred a week ago when Drift migrated the management authority of the protocol from an old multi-signature wallet to a new multi-signature wallet. This new wallet was created by one of the signers from the old multi-signature wallet, but that signer did not add themselves to the new multi-signature wallet.
The attacker seized this vulnerability, first initiating a proposal in the old multi-signature to transfer Drift's administrative rights to a new wallet (controlled by the attacker).
The new multi-signature was set up with five signers, only one of whom was from the old wallet, while the other four were entirely new. The rules were extremely lenient: only 2 out of 5 needed to agree (meaning only 2 signatures were enough), and there was a 0-second time lock (the proposal was executed immediately without any waiting period).
In the early hours of today, the only remaining old signer proposed in the new multi-signature: "Change Drift's administrative rights to the wallet truly controlled by the attacker."
Seconds later, another new signer immediately co-signed, easily reaching the ⅖ threshold. Because there was no time lock, the proposal was executed instantly, granting the attacker complete administrative rights.
Subsequently, the attacker immediately used their authority to create a CVT spot market in the Drift protocol, with a total supply of about 750 million tokens, of which the attacker held 600 million. The attacker then used their controlled SwitchboardOnDemand oracle and configured Drift to read from that oracle.
After completing the operation, the attacker raised the price of the previously nearly worthless CVT token through 20 transactions, making the 600 million CVT they deposited appear to be worth hundreds of millions of dollars according to the oracle. As a result, the attacker borrowed assets worth about $220 - $280 million, including 41.72 million JLP (Jupiter LP token, worth about $155 million), 51.61 million USDC, and 164 cbBTC (worth about $11.29 million).
The modular structure of DeFi was once seen as the greatest advantage of the field, but now this advantage has also transmitted risks to other DeFi protocols integrated into the Drift lending market in the Solana space like a domino effect.
Jupiter is the biggest victim affected by this security incident, with the most stolen JLP being the core LP asset of the Jupiter perpetual contract market. This theft will significantly reduce the liquidity of the Jupiter perpetual contract market and trigger panic withdrawals and a decline in the JUP token, among other chain reactions.
In addition, over 15 DeFi protocols including Perena, Project 0, Exponent, Carrot, Ranger, PiggyBank, Reflect, Elemental, Neutral Trade, Pyra, Fuse, and XPlace have confirmed varying degrees of impact from the Drift theft incident, with some withdrawal functions already suspended.
However, among all security incidents, the most affected are still the users, as the continuous hacking events repeatedly shake users' confidence in DeFi.
"Today I'm not doing anything else, I'm withdrawing all funds from all old projects on-chain, and for new projects, unless I know them particularly well, I'm not investing either. It's a tumultuous time, don't test human nature." After losing over $6,000 in this incident, well-known KOL Tu Ao Da Shi posted this statement.
You may also like

Consumer-grade Crypto Global Survey: Users, Revenue, and Track Distribution

Prediction Markets Under Bias

Stolen: $290 million, Three Parties Refusing to Acknowledge, Who Should Foot the Bill for the KelpDAO Incident Resolution?

ASTEROID Pumped 10,000x in Three Days, Is Meme Season Back on Ethereum?

ChainCatcher Hong Kong Themed Forum Highlights: Decoding the Growth Engine Under the Integration of Crypto Assets and Smart Economy

Why can this institution still grow by 150% when the scale of leading crypto VCs has shrunk significantly?

Anthropic's $1 trillion, compared to DeepSeek's $100 billion

Geopolitical Risk Persists, Is Bitcoin Becoming a Key Barometer?

Annualized 11.5%, Wall Street Buzzing: Is MicroStrategy's STRC Bitcoin's Savior or Destroyer?

An Obscure Open Source AI Tool Alerted on Kelp DAO's $292 million Bug 12 Days Ago

Mixin has launched USTD-margined perpetual contracts, bringing derivative trading into the chat scene.
The privacy-focused crypto wallet Mixin announced today the launch of its U-based perpetual contract (a derivative priced in USDT). Unlike traditional exchanges, Mixin has taken a new approach by "liberating" derivative trading from isolated matching engines and embedding it into the instant messaging environment.
Users can directly open positions within the app with leverage of up to 200x, while sharing positions, discussing strategies, and copy trading within private communities. Trading, social interaction, and asset management are integrated into the same interface.
Based on its non-custodial architecture, Mixin has eliminated friction from the traditional onboarding process, allowing users to participate in perpetual contract trading without identity verification.
The trading process has been streamlined into five steps:
· Choose the trading asset
· Select long or short
· Input position size and leverage
· Confirm order details
· Confirm and open the position
The interface provides real-time visualization of price, position, and profit and loss (PnL), allowing users to complete trades without switching between multiple modules.
Mixin has directly integrated social features into the derivative trading environment. Users can create private trading communities and interact around real-time positions:
· End-to-end encrypted private groups supporting up to 1024 members
· End-to-end encrypted voice communication
· One-click position sharing
· One-click trade copying
On the execution side, Mixin aggregates liquidity from multiple sources and accesses decentralized protocol and external market liquidity through a unified trading interface.
By combining social interaction with trade execution, Mixin enables users to collaborate, share, and execute trading strategies instantly within the same environment.
Mixin has also introduced a referral incentive system based on trading behavior:
· Users can join with an invite code
· Up to 60% of trading fees as referral rewards
· Incentive mechanism designed for long-term, sustainable earnings
This model aims to drive user-driven network expansion and organic growth.
Mixin's derivative transactions are built on top of its existing self-custody wallet infrastructure, with core features including:
· Separation of transaction account and asset storage
· User full control over assets
· Platform does not custody user funds
· Built-in privacy mechanisms to reduce data exposure
The system aims to strike a balance between transaction efficiency, asset security, and privacy protection.
Against the background of perpetual contracts becoming a mainstream trading tool, Mixin is exploring a different development direction by lowering barriers, enhancing social and privacy attributes.
The platform does not only view transactions as execution actions but positions them as a networked activity: transactions have social attributes, strategies can be shared, and relationships between individuals also become part of the financial system.
Mixin's design is based on a user-initiated, user-controlled model. The platform neither custodies assets nor executes transactions on behalf of users.
This model aligns with a statement issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on April 13, 2026, titled "Staff Statement on Whether Partial User Interface Used in Preparing Cryptocurrency Securities Transactions May Require Broker-Dealer Registration."
The statement indicates that, under the premise where transactions are entirely initiated and controlled by users, non-custodial service providers that offer neutral interfaces may not need to register as broker-dealers or exchanges.
Mixin is a decentralized, self-custodial privacy wallet designed to provide secure and efficient digital asset management services.
Its core capabilities include:
· Aggregation: integrating multi-chain assets and routing between different transaction paths to simplify user operations
· High liquidity access: connecting to various liquidity sources, including decentralized protocols and external markets
· Decentralization: achieving full user control over assets without relying on custodial intermediaries
· Privacy protection: safeguarding assets and data through MPC, CryptoNote, and end-to-end encrypted communication
Mixin has been in operation for over 8 years, supporting over 40 blockchains and more than 10,000 assets, with a global user base exceeding 10 million and an on-chain self-custodied asset scale of over $1 billion.

$600 million stolen in 20 days, ushering in the era of AI hackers in the crypto world

Vitalik's 2026 Hong Kong Web3 Summit Speech: Ethereum's Ultimate Vision as the "World Computer" and Future Roadmap

On the same day Aave introduced rsETH, why did Spark decide to exit?

Full Post-Mortem of the KelpDAO Incident: Why Did Aave, Which Was Not Compromised, End Up in Crisis Situation?

After a $290 million DeFi liquidation, is the security promise still there?

ZachXBT's post ignites RAVE nearing zero, what is the truth behind the insider control?


