Forbes: Does quantum technology threaten the encryption industry? But it is more likely an opportunity
Original Title: Quantum Advances Are An Opportunity For Crypto
Original Author: Sean Stein Smith, Forbes
Original Translation: Saoirse, Foresight News
Currently, the crypto industry is already overwhelmed by public opinion turmoil, geopolitical conflicts, and financial instability, and Google's latest research has brought new challenges to this field: the timeline for the practical implementation of quantum computing is continuously being advanced.
For years, the potential threats posed by quantum computing have been discussed, debated, and researched within the industry, and blockchain developers have long been working on developing quantum-resistant cryptographic technologies. However, what truly stirs the investment market is the speed of technological iteration. The Google Quantum AI team pointed out that quantum computers need less than 500,000 qubits to crack the elliptic curve cryptography algorithm used by btc-42">Bitcoin—this encryption method has long been recognized as the most secure. Setting aside the technical parameters of qubits, the key fact is that the latest estimates of the required number of qubits are far lower than previously expected, which brings the potential "life-and-death test" for the blockchain ecosystem forward to 2029.
In addition to Bitcoin potentially exposing security vulnerabilities in just 9 minutes, another report focused on the risks faced by Ethereum: the network has up to 5 potential attack vectors, which, if exploited, could jeopardize approximately $100 billion in DeFi and tokenized assets.
It should be clarified that the quantum computers mentioned in these research reports have not yet truly emerged and remain at a theoretical level. However, the related discussions have led to tokens and protocols with quantum-resistant characteristics achieving double-digit increases. Additionally, tokens considered "quantum-compatible," which adopt more advanced protocols like zero-knowledge proofs, have also benefited from this wave of attention.
Setting aside speculative emotions and panic-driven surges, as quantum technology continues to permeate broader financial markets, investors should recognize some key experiences and insights.
Quantum risks are no longer theoretical, which is actually a good thing
Discussions surrounding quantum computing and cryptocurrencies have shifted from abstract risks to quantifiable real threats.
New research shows that quantum systems may only need between 10,000 to 26,000 qubits to break the currently widely used encryption standards, a significant decrease from previous estimates in the millions. More importantly, the attack scenarios are no longer hypothetical. Researchers have outlined some attack methods: private keys can be extracted from ongoing transactions within minutes, and funds can even be transferred before transaction confirmation.
This reality has redefined the core issues for investors, auditing firms, and policymakers: the risk is no longer just "will quantum computing emerge," but whether existing systems can migrate quickly enough to post-quantum cryptographic frameworks. Estimates suggest that "quantum nodes" could arrive as early as 2029, leaving the industry with a time window shorter than most financial infrastructure upgrade cycles.
From a practical perspective, the market is facing a typical accounting and valuation dilemma: it needs to recognize and assess potential liabilities before they convert into actual losses.
The market is already pricing in the quantum transition
Although underlying threats are gradually becoming apparent, market behavior indicates that participants are not waiting for the situation to clarify. Tokens and projects emphasizing quantum resistance have seen increases nearing 50%, indicating that capital is proactively positioning itself in defensive infrastructure and related projects.
This is a common pattern in financial markets: investors often factor in structural risks into prices before they materialize. In the current context, this means capital will flow towards quantum-resistant cryptographic technologies, blockchain protocols that have completed upgrades, and participants focused on security construction in this field.
Meanwhile, despite increasingly clear warnings, the prices of mainstream crypto assets remain relatively stable. This reflects a growing consensus in the market: this transformation will be completed through upgrades at the protocol level, rather than leading to the industry's demise.
For accounting and auditing professionals, this introduces a new dimension to valuation analysis. Digital assets must contend not only with market volatility and regulatory changes but also with the risk of technological obsolescence—these risks must be disclosed, modeled, and stress-tested.
The crypto industry is unlikely to perish, but the underlying architecture will be restructured
Despite the increasingly urgent warnings, the overall conclusion from various studies and industry commentary is quite clear: quantum computing will not overturn blockchain but will force it to restructure its security systems. Recent analyses have pointed out multiple attack paths, including rapid exploitation of transaction-layer vulnerabilities and slow attacks on dormant wallets with exposed keys.
At the same time, ongoing research in the post-quantum cryptography field indicates that viable countermeasures already exist, though their level of widespread application remains uneven.
Importantly, any observer, investor, or policy advocate can attest: blockchain systems are not static. Protocol upgrades, hard forks, and migrations of cryptographic algorithms have long been part of the ecosystem's operational mechanisms. Compared to traditional financial infrastructure, this adaptability itself is a structural advantage.
Quantum computing does not bring fatal flaws but rather a forced opportunity for advancement. The ultimate winners will not be those who attempt to evade risks but those who drive transformation, embedding quantum resistance into governance, information disclosure, and technical design before the threats fully materialize.
You may also like

Consumer-grade Crypto Global Survey: Users, Revenue, and Track Distribution

Prediction Markets Under Bias

Stolen: $290 million, Three Parties Refusing to Acknowledge, Who Should Foot the Bill for the KelpDAO Incident Resolution?

ASTEROID Pumped 10,000x in Three Days, Is Meme Season Back on Ethereum?

ChainCatcher Hong Kong Themed Forum Highlights: Decoding the Growth Engine Under the Integration of Crypto Assets and Smart Economy

Why can this institution still grow by 150% when the scale of leading crypto VCs has shrunk significantly?

Anthropic's $1 trillion, compared to DeepSeek's $100 billion

Geopolitical Risk Persists, Is Bitcoin Becoming a Key Barometer?

Annualized 11.5%, Wall Street Buzzing: Is MicroStrategy's STRC Bitcoin's Savior or Destroyer?

An Obscure Open Source AI Tool Alerted on Kelp DAO's $292 million Bug 12 Days Ago

Mixin has launched USTD-margined perpetual contracts, bringing derivative trading into the chat scene.
The privacy-focused crypto wallet Mixin announced today the launch of its U-based perpetual contract (a derivative priced in USDT). Unlike traditional exchanges, Mixin has taken a new approach by "liberating" derivative trading from isolated matching engines and embedding it into the instant messaging environment.
Users can directly open positions within the app with leverage of up to 200x, while sharing positions, discussing strategies, and copy trading within private communities. Trading, social interaction, and asset management are integrated into the same interface.
Based on its non-custodial architecture, Mixin has eliminated friction from the traditional onboarding process, allowing users to participate in perpetual contract trading without identity verification.
The trading process has been streamlined into five steps:
· Choose the trading asset
· Select long or short
· Input position size and leverage
· Confirm order details
· Confirm and open the position
The interface provides real-time visualization of price, position, and profit and loss (PnL), allowing users to complete trades without switching between multiple modules.
Mixin has directly integrated social features into the derivative trading environment. Users can create private trading communities and interact around real-time positions:
· End-to-end encrypted private groups supporting up to 1024 members
· End-to-end encrypted voice communication
· One-click position sharing
· One-click trade copying
On the execution side, Mixin aggregates liquidity from multiple sources and accesses decentralized protocol and external market liquidity through a unified trading interface.
By combining social interaction with trade execution, Mixin enables users to collaborate, share, and execute trading strategies instantly within the same environment.
Mixin has also introduced a referral incentive system based on trading behavior:
· Users can join with an invite code
· Up to 60% of trading fees as referral rewards
· Incentive mechanism designed for long-term, sustainable earnings
This model aims to drive user-driven network expansion and organic growth.
Mixin's derivative transactions are built on top of its existing self-custody wallet infrastructure, with core features including:
· Separation of transaction account and asset storage
· User full control over assets
· Platform does not custody user funds
· Built-in privacy mechanisms to reduce data exposure
The system aims to strike a balance between transaction efficiency, asset security, and privacy protection.
Against the background of perpetual contracts becoming a mainstream trading tool, Mixin is exploring a different development direction by lowering barriers, enhancing social and privacy attributes.
The platform does not only view transactions as execution actions but positions them as a networked activity: transactions have social attributes, strategies can be shared, and relationships between individuals also become part of the financial system.
Mixin's design is based on a user-initiated, user-controlled model. The platform neither custodies assets nor executes transactions on behalf of users.
This model aligns with a statement issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on April 13, 2026, titled "Staff Statement on Whether Partial User Interface Used in Preparing Cryptocurrency Securities Transactions May Require Broker-Dealer Registration."
The statement indicates that, under the premise where transactions are entirely initiated and controlled by users, non-custodial service providers that offer neutral interfaces may not need to register as broker-dealers or exchanges.
Mixin is a decentralized, self-custodial privacy wallet designed to provide secure and efficient digital asset management services.
Its core capabilities include:
· Aggregation: integrating multi-chain assets and routing between different transaction paths to simplify user operations
· High liquidity access: connecting to various liquidity sources, including decentralized protocols and external markets
· Decentralization: achieving full user control over assets without relying on custodial intermediaries
· Privacy protection: safeguarding assets and data through MPC, CryptoNote, and end-to-end encrypted communication
Mixin has been in operation for over 8 years, supporting over 40 blockchains and more than 10,000 assets, with a global user base exceeding 10 million and an on-chain self-custodied asset scale of over $1 billion.

$600 million stolen in 20 days, ushering in the era of AI hackers in the crypto world

Vitalik's 2026 Hong Kong Web3 Summit Speech: Ethereum's Ultimate Vision as the "World Computer" and Future Roadmap

On the same day Aave introduced rsETH, why did Spark decide to exit?

Full Post-Mortem of the KelpDAO Incident: Why Did Aave, Which Was Not Compromised, End Up in Crisis Situation?

After a $290 million DeFi liquidation, is the security promise still there?

ZachXBT's post ignites RAVE nearing zero, what is the truth behind the insider control?








