Behind the Base FUD Storm: Over $2.5 Billion in Net Inflows in the Past 3 Months, TVL Surpasses Solana
Original Article Title: "Behind the Base Mudslinging: Over $25 Billion in Net Fund Inflows in the Past 3 Months, TVL Exceeds $14.2 Billion Surpassing Solana"
Original Article Author: Frank, PANews
Historically, many public blockchains have liked to label their competitors as Solana, but it seems that no one has been able to truly threaten Solana. However, recently, Solana co-founder Toly seems very willing to engage in a debate with Base's co-founder. At the same time, in recent times, the Base ecosystem has seen explosive growth in various aspects of data, with multiple metrics not only leading in the L2 sector but also surpassing Solana in TVL, fund inflows, and other data.
It seems that Base is actually Solana's biggest potential rival. PANews reviewed Base's recent data and compared it with Solana, exploring whether Base's rise is a real threat or just another false alarm.
Continuous Battle of Wits Between the Two Co-founders
On January 6th, Solana's co-founder Toly commented on social media, suggesting that Base's development has not truly brought growth to the Ethereum ecosystem but that Coinbase is actually draining the Ethereum ecosystem through Base. In response to this statement, Base's founder Jesse retaliated on social media, stating that Base and Ethereum do not have a zero-sum competitive relationship. Base, just like other L2 solutions, is developing within the overall roadmap of Ethereum, and as Base grows, Ethereum also grows and strengthens.
Toly then made an analogy, stating that just as Google and Microsoft's competition has contributed to Linux, the value capture is separate. Therefore, no Fortune 500 company uses a single accounting method to attribute Base's activity to Ethereum but all account for it under the Coinbase company. The $2.15 million in revenue generated by Base is also only paying $59,000 to the Ethereum mainnet.
It may seem like Toly is speaking out for ETH not capturing value from Base, but in reality, the behind-the-scenes of this debate may be unrelated to the competition between Base and Ethereum but rather about the competition between Solana and Base. Although there are many competitors to Solana in the market, such as those positioning themselves as Sui, Aptos, or Hyperliquid, competitors of Solana. From the Solana team's perspective, their biggest competitor may be Base.
As early as December, Pudgy Penguins announced the issuance of a token on Solana, setting a new daily transaction record on the Solana network with 66.9 million transactions on the day of the launch. During this process, Jesse also made a public statement, saying, "Both I and the Base community will warmly welcome Pudgy Penguin and its token PENGU," which was seen by the community as a public move to compete with Solana.
In addition, there have been back-and-forth exchanges between the two in various discussions. For example, Yuga Labs co-founder Garga.eth criticized the Ethereum ecosystem, which received Jesse's dissatisfaction, while Toly added fuel to the fire by commenting below: "Bridging ETH to Solana, I absolutely do not oppose ETH becoming the best currency on Solana." Previously, Jesse has also made several statements comparing Base to Solana.
Base TVL and Inflow Surpass Solana
Behind the verbal battles of the two is the underlying data flow between Base and Solana. PANews compared several key data metrics of Base and Solana over the past year, revealing that while Base's overall data currently lags behind Solana, Base's growth rate is clearly outpacing Solana. If this rate of development continues, Base is likely to surpass Solana in terms of data within 1 to 2 years.
PANews selected several commonly used metrics for public chain comparison, such as daily active addresses, transaction counts, TVL, etc. The data covers changes from a year ago to January 10, 2025.
First, looking at the changes in Base's data, a year ago, Base had a daily transaction count of approximately 338,000, a daily active address count of about 61,200, and a TVL of around $830 million. These figures were equivalent to approximately 1.48%, 11.29%, and 63.85% of Solana at that time, respectively.
As of January 10, 2025, Base's data has changed to a daily transaction count of approximately 11.1 million, a daily active address count of about 811,200, and a TVL of around $14.2 billion. The current ratios of these three metrics to Solana are: 17.59%, 12.88%, and 167.06%.

The annual growth rates of these three metrics for Base were 3184.02%, 1225.49%, and 1610.84%, respectively. Whereas, during the same period, Solana saw growth rates of 176.75%, 1062.36%, and 553.85% for these three metrics.
It can be observed that after a year of development, Base still lags behind Solana in terms of transaction volume and daily active users. However, in terms of Total Value Locked (TVL), Base has successfully overtaken Solana. Interestingly, to celebrate this achievement, Jesse and other key team members shaved their heads live on January 9th.

Looking at the growth rates of other metrics, Base's growth momentum is also more aggressive compared to Solana. If both parties maintain their current growth rate, Base may surpass Solana in terms of transaction volume in a year.
Aside from these data points, a more important indicator is quietly undergoing a change. For most of the past year, Solana was the network with the highest inflow of funds. However, data from the last three months shows that Base has become the public chain with the highest net inflow of $25 billion, while Solana ranks second with a net inflow of $9 billion.

The main shift in this data may have occurred recently, with the net inflow in the past year totaling around $38 billion, of which the net inflow in the last three months ($25 billion) accounts for 65% of the annual total.
From Elections to Virtuals, Base is Closing in with AI
From the perspective of detailed changes, this is indeed the case. Base's TVL volume seems to have experienced significant growth starting from November 3. However, this is not unique to Base, as Arbitrum also saw a wave of rapid development during the same period.

The main reason behind this growth wave may mainly stem from the overall market growth brought about by Trump's re-election after the U.S. election. Over the past month, the main reason Base has attracted attention is that after a long period of competing with Solana in the MEME track, a product finally emerged to rival it — Virtuals Protocol.
Various networks have quietly released their Pump.fun imitations, but most have gone unnoticed. Virtuals Protocol has finally seized the opportunity of the AI Agent trend, becoming the most popular AI Agent one-click launch platform. This has given birth to several AI Agent tokens with market values exceeding billions, such as aixbt and G.A.M.E.
According to Dexscreener data, on January 11th, the DEX trading volume on Solana was $68.8 billion, with 5324 newly created pools in the past 24 hours. The Base trading volume was $21.2 billion, with 2673 new trading pairs added in the last 24 hours. The gap between the two in the MEME field is gradually narrowing, and Base seems to be the only one capable of approaching Solana's popularity in the MEME arena.
However, Sui also had a brief period of explosive growth in the past. Still, after the heat subsided, it inevitably fell silent again. Base's relative advantage lies in the stronger effect of its capital immobilization compared to Sui. Therefore, as long as the TVL volume does not plummet drastically, perhaps this heat can still be maintained.
By comparing the data, it can be seen that Base is becoming Solana's strongest competitor. However, the issue lies in Base always lacking its governance token, making it difficult to be market-priced. The absence of a native token also allows Virtuals protocol to receive more capital overflow effects on the Base public chain. To address this issue, on January 4th, Base developer Jesse Pollak tweeted that Coinbase is considering offering tokenized COIN stocks on its Base network to its U.S. users.
If this goal can be achieved, perhaps the most significant meaning is not that the RWA field has added another important asset, but that the value brought by Base's development can finally be more directly reflected in Coinbase's stock price. For investors who can only participate in cryptocurrency trading, this can be seen as an indirect way to participate in Base's governance and enjoy dividends. Judging by Base's current data performance, the market value of the tokenized version should be above tens of billions of dollars. On January 11th, Coinbase's market cap was approximately $64.7 billion, a value that ranks below BNB and SOL in the cryptocurrency world. It remains to be seen if, once the on-chain capital flows into Base, Coinbase's market cap can surpass BNB and SOL.
You may also like

Consumer-grade Crypto Global Survey: Users, Revenue, and Track Distribution

Prediction Markets Under Bias

Stolen: $290 million, Three Parties Refusing to Acknowledge, Who Should Foot the Bill for the KelpDAO Incident Resolution?

ASTEROID Pumped 10,000x in Three Days, Is Meme Season Back on Ethereum?

ChainCatcher Hong Kong Themed Forum Highlights: Decoding the Growth Engine Under the Integration of Crypto Assets and Smart Economy

Why can this institution still grow by 150% when the scale of leading crypto VCs has shrunk significantly?

Anthropic's $1 trillion, compared to DeepSeek's $100 billion

Geopolitical Risk Persists, Is Bitcoin Becoming a Key Barometer?

Annualized 11.5%, Wall Street Buzzing: Is MicroStrategy's STRC Bitcoin's Savior or Destroyer?

An Obscure Open Source AI Tool Alerted on Kelp DAO's $292 million Bug 12 Days Ago

Mixin has launched USTD-margined perpetual contracts, bringing derivative trading into the chat scene.
The privacy-focused crypto wallet Mixin announced today the launch of its U-based perpetual contract (a derivative priced in USDT). Unlike traditional exchanges, Mixin has taken a new approach by "liberating" derivative trading from isolated matching engines and embedding it into the instant messaging environment.
Users can directly open positions within the app with leverage of up to 200x, while sharing positions, discussing strategies, and copy trading within private communities. Trading, social interaction, and asset management are integrated into the same interface.
Based on its non-custodial architecture, Mixin has eliminated friction from the traditional onboarding process, allowing users to participate in perpetual contract trading without identity verification.
The trading process has been streamlined into five steps:
· Choose the trading asset
· Select long or short
· Input position size and leverage
· Confirm order details
· Confirm and open the position
The interface provides real-time visualization of price, position, and profit and loss (PnL), allowing users to complete trades without switching between multiple modules.
Mixin has directly integrated social features into the derivative trading environment. Users can create private trading communities and interact around real-time positions:
· End-to-end encrypted private groups supporting up to 1024 members
· End-to-end encrypted voice communication
· One-click position sharing
· One-click trade copying
On the execution side, Mixin aggregates liquidity from multiple sources and accesses decentralized protocol and external market liquidity through a unified trading interface.
By combining social interaction with trade execution, Mixin enables users to collaborate, share, and execute trading strategies instantly within the same environment.
Mixin has also introduced a referral incentive system based on trading behavior:
· Users can join with an invite code
· Up to 60% of trading fees as referral rewards
· Incentive mechanism designed for long-term, sustainable earnings
This model aims to drive user-driven network expansion and organic growth.
Mixin's derivative transactions are built on top of its existing self-custody wallet infrastructure, with core features including:
· Separation of transaction account and asset storage
· User full control over assets
· Platform does not custody user funds
· Built-in privacy mechanisms to reduce data exposure
The system aims to strike a balance between transaction efficiency, asset security, and privacy protection.
Against the background of perpetual contracts becoming a mainstream trading tool, Mixin is exploring a different development direction by lowering barriers, enhancing social and privacy attributes.
The platform does not only view transactions as execution actions but positions them as a networked activity: transactions have social attributes, strategies can be shared, and relationships between individuals also become part of the financial system.
Mixin's design is based on a user-initiated, user-controlled model. The platform neither custodies assets nor executes transactions on behalf of users.
This model aligns with a statement issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on April 13, 2026, titled "Staff Statement on Whether Partial User Interface Used in Preparing Cryptocurrency Securities Transactions May Require Broker-Dealer Registration."
The statement indicates that, under the premise where transactions are entirely initiated and controlled by users, non-custodial service providers that offer neutral interfaces may not need to register as broker-dealers or exchanges.
Mixin is a decentralized, self-custodial privacy wallet designed to provide secure and efficient digital asset management services.
Its core capabilities include:
· Aggregation: integrating multi-chain assets and routing between different transaction paths to simplify user operations
· High liquidity access: connecting to various liquidity sources, including decentralized protocols and external markets
· Decentralization: achieving full user control over assets without relying on custodial intermediaries
· Privacy protection: safeguarding assets and data through MPC, CryptoNote, and end-to-end encrypted communication
Mixin has been in operation for over 8 years, supporting over 40 blockchains and more than 10,000 assets, with a global user base exceeding 10 million and an on-chain self-custodied asset scale of over $1 billion.

$600 million stolen in 20 days, ushering in the era of AI hackers in the crypto world

Vitalik's 2026 Hong Kong Web3 Summit Speech: Ethereum's Ultimate Vision as the "World Computer" and Future Roadmap

On the same day Aave introduced rsETH, why did Spark decide to exit?

Full Post-Mortem of the KelpDAO Incident: Why Did Aave, Which Was Not Compromised, End Up in Crisis Situation?

After a $290 million DeFi liquidation, is the security promise still there?

ZachXBT's post ignites RAVE nearing zero, what is the truth behind the insider control?


