2024 Memecoin Spending Report: Top "Whale" Transaction Fee Exceeds $130 Million, with Raydium and Bot Reaping the Most Benefits
Original Title: "2024 Memecoin Annual Consumption Report: Largest 'Whale' Spends $130 Million in Fees, Raydium and Bot Top Beneficiaries"
Original Author: Tesa, ChainCatcher
In 2024, Memecoin has become the hottest trend in the Crypto world. Soaring from a $200 billion market cap in 2023 to over a trillion dollars in 2024, Memecoin has not only solidified its position in the crypto market but has also outperformed benchmark indices of mainstream cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, becoming the most dazzling asset class of the year.
Within this trading frenzy, numerous 'Whale' players emerged. They paid substantial fees in Memecoin transactions, directly driving the prosperous development of chains like Solana and filling the coffers of Memecoin infrastructure platforms such as Raydium, Jito, and Pump.fun.
Recently, ChainCatcher, in collaboration with the Memecoin intelligent trading platform Tesa and the Memecoin project Evan the Hobo, released the "2024 Memecoin Annual Consumption Report." This report provides a deep analysis of the consumption data of Memecoin players with transaction amounts exceeding $1,000 on the Solana chain in 2024, starting from fee distribution, comprehensively presenting the consumption behavior of Memecoin users this year and the benefit situation of various platforms.
If you wish to inquire about an individual's 2024 Solana consumption report, please refer to this link: https://report.tesa.top/
Key Data Overview
1. Total Memecoin Transaction Fees on the Solana Chain: Over $30.93 Billion.
2. Revenue Situation of Major Core Platforms:
· DEX such as Raydium: Earned $17 Billion in Fees, accounting for 56%.
· Trading Bots: Accumulated $7.5 Billion in Fees, representing 24%, with Photon leading with a 33% share.
· MEV Infrastructure Jito: Earned $3.4 billion, accounting for 11%.
· Pump.fun: Earned $2.4 billion, accounting for 8%.
1. User Concentration: The top 10% of users contributed 90% of the fees, with whale users averaging a high consumption of $13,000.
2. Top Users: The largest "whale" on Raydium spent nearly $130 million in a year.
Memecoin Fee Total and Distribution
1. Total Fee Amount Exceeding $30 Billion
As the most popular Memecoin public chain in 2024, Solana's on-chain fee data has become a microcosm of the entire Memecoin market consumption. By analyzing about 4 million Solana user addresses with transaction amounts exceeding $1,000 in 2024, the total fees generated by Memecoin transactions on the Solana chain amounted to a staggering $30.93 billion, demonstrating Solana's dominant position in Memecoin transactions.
2. DEX Raydium and Other DEXs as the Biggest Beneficiaries, Earning Over $17 Billion in Fees
The over $30 billion in fees contributed by Memecoin users mainly flowed to four major platforms: decentralized exchanges (DEXs) like Raydium, trading bots (such as Photon), MEV Infrastructure Jito, and the one-click token issuance platform Pump.fun.
Among them, DEXs like Raydium took the lead with over $17 billion in fee revenue, accounting for 56% of the total, with Raydium alone capturing an 80% share of fees among all DEXs. Trading bots followed with $7.5 billion, representing 24%.
Jito, providing priority transaction (anti-front-running) services, earned $3.4 billion, accounting for 11% due to its exclusive ability. Pump.fun, on the other hand, simplified the token issuance process and gained $2.4 billion, representing 8%.

3. Photon Accounts for Over 33% of Total Transaction BOT Fees and Emerges as the Most Popular BOT
Among various transaction BOTs, Photon stands out by earning a total of $250 million in fees in 2024, representing 33.3% of all transaction BOT fees. Following closely behind are Trojan and Bullx, earning $123 million and over $94 million in fees, accounting for 16.2% and 12.4%, respectively.
Additionally, other BOTs also generated substantial revenue: PepeBoost earned $65.1 million, representing 8.6%; BonkBot earned $63.17 million, representing 8.3%; GMGM and BananaGun earned $23.76 million and $20.53 million, accounting for 3.1% and 2.70%, respectively.
Meanwhile, the data provider of this report, Tesa meme trading platform, offers users a different choice. In contrast to traditional BOTs that charge a 1% transaction fee, Tesa reduces user transaction costs through a subscription model. Furthermore, Tesa has launched the CEX Listing Sniper feature.

4. Whale Users Spent an Average of $13,000 in Transaction Fees for Memecoin Trades in 2024
In 2024, Memecoin players showed significant differences in average transaction fee expenditures across major platforms:
· Raydium: $445.45 per user
· Transaction BOT: $193.89 per user
· Jito: $87.07 per user
· Pump.fun: $63.13 per user

Users are categorized into three groups based on the amount of transaction fees:
1. Whale Users (top 5% highest fees): Avg. annual expenditure as high as $13,000.
2. Regular Users (in the 20%-30% fee range): Avg. expenditure $171.28.
3. Newbie User (25% with the lowest fees): Average spending per person is only $17.67.
In terms of platform preference, Raydium and Trading BOT have become the main fee expenditure places for whale users and regular users, while Newbie Users tend to choose Trading BOT and Pump.fun.

5. The Largest "Whale" User on a Single Platform Spent $129 Million in Fees
In 2024, the Memecoin market saw the emergence of a true "whale" user. Among them, user address MfDuWeq on platforms like Raydium paid a staggering $129 million in fees in one year, far ahead of other platforms.
In contrast, the highest fee expenditures on other platforms were relatively "moderate":
· Trading BOT: $1.43 million
· Jito: $6.1399 million
· Pump.fun: $2.3992 million
This significant difference further highlights Raydium's dominant position in the Memecoin trading market.

II. Memecoin User Expenditure Concentration and Cross-Platform Characteristics
1. Top 10% of Users by Spending Contribute Over 90% of Fees
Memecoin users' spending behavior exhibits a clear "80-20 rule": a few top users contribute the majority of fees. The specific data is as follows:
· The top 1% of users contributed 67.46% of the fees, with an average fee amount of $53,000 per person;
· The top 10% of users contributed 90.97%, with an average fee amount of around $7,182 per person;
· The top 20% of users contributed 95.24%. The average fee amount per person is approximately $3,760.
This high level of consumption concentration indicates that the fee income in the Memecoin market mainly relies on a small number of high-spending users, while the fee expenditure of the majority of regular users is relatively low.

2. Raydium has the highest consumption concentration, Pump.fun relatively lower
Among Raydium, Trading BOT, Jito, and Pump.fun, Raydium has the highest consumption concentration. Data shows that the top 1% of users contributed $1.358 billion in fees, accounting for 79.88% of the total $1.7 billion in fees, with an average fee per person reaching $34,700; while the average fee per person for users ranking in the 2-20% range is below $800, and the long-tail users ranking beyond 20% have an average fee per person of less than $100. This also reflects Raydium's high dependence on top users.

In contrast, for Jito, the top 1% of users in fee ranking contributed $186 million in fees, accounting for 54.55%, although the concentration is lower than Raydium, it still exceeds half. There is also a significant difference in the average fees between Jito's top users and long-tail users, with the top 1% of users around $4,759, while users in the 2%-10% range drop to $300, and long-tail users ranking beyond 10% have an average fee per person of less than $50.

The consumption concentration at the top end for Trading BOT and Pump.fun is relatively lower:
· Trading BOT: The top 1% of users contributed $313 million, accounting for 41.24%.
· Pump.fun: The top 1% of users contributed $96.62 million, accounting for 39.07%.
This difference indicates that different platforms have significant differences in user structure and profit models.

In terms of average fees per person, there is also a significant difference between top users and long-tail users on Trading BOT and Pump.fun. The top 1% of users on Trading BOT have an average fee per person of $7,990, while users in the 2%-10% range are less than $1,000, and users beyond the 20% range are all below $60.
The average fee per user in the top 1% on Pump.fun reached $2467, while users ranked 2%-10% paid less than $300, and those ranked after 20% paid less than $50.

3. Raydium Has the Highest Utilization Rate, with Over Half of Users Relying on Trading Bots
Within the Solana DEX ecosystem, despite Raydium's higher transaction fee (0.25%) compared to Meteora's (0.16%), Raydium still attracts the vast majority of users due to its strong market dominance. Statistical data shows:
· Out of approximately 4 million Solana addresses, around 89.27% (3.4968 million addresses) have used Raydium.
· In contrast, the total utilization rate of Meteora and other DEXs is only 35.53% (1.3917 million addresses).
This phenomenon indicates that Memecoin users, when choosing a trading platform, do not solely consider fees but also value factors such as liquidity, user experience, and platform stability.

Furthermore, the use of trading bots is also widespread:
· Over 2.11 million addresses utilize trading bots, with a usage rate of 53.83%.
· In comparison, the utilization rates for Pump.fun and Jito are 46.43% and 45.01%, respectively, still below the halfway mark.
These data reflect users' high reliance on efficient and convenient trading tools, while also showcasing Raydium's absolute market dominance.
4. Over Half of Bot Users Use Only a Single Bot Platform
Within the trading bot market, user choices exhibit noticeable concentration. The data shows:
· 66% (1.3995 million) of bot user addresses use only a single trading bot.
· 34% (712,400) of users choose to use multiple BOT trades.
This percentage indicates that users have high loyalty to the selected BOT platform, or due to the lack of significant differentiation between platforms, users, once they choose a BOT, lack the motivation to switch or engage in multi-platform trading.

5. Users Not Using BOTs Have Significantly Higher Transaction Volume
Compared to users using trading BOTs, users not using BOTs have an average transaction volume several times higher:
· Users using BOTs: Average transaction volume is $93,500.
· Users not using BOTs: Average transaction volume reaches $678,800.
This data may reflect that the BOT user group consists mainly of regular users and newbies, while high-volume whale users tend to prefer manual operation or use efficient tools to seek more precise control.

6. Whale Users Prefer Photon, Regular Users Lean Towards Trojan
Users with different spending levels show significant differences in choosing trading BOTs:
Whale Users (Top 5%)
· Photon is the most popular trading BOT, contributing 38.9% of transaction fees.
· Trojan follows closely, with a share of 15.02%.
This choice indicates that whale users prefer to use the powerful and stable Photon BOT.
Regular Users (Ranked 20%-30%)
· Trojan is the top choice for regular users, accounting for 19.27% of total transaction fees.
· Photon and Bullx rank second and third with 17.34% and 14.71%, respectively.
The choice of regular users is becoming more diverse, demonstrating widespread acceptance of different BOT features.
Newbie Users (Bottom 25%)
· The choice of newbie users is relatively dispersed, with Trojan, Photon, PepeBoost, and Bullx being the main trading BOTS, each contributing over 10% of the fees.
This distribution reflects that newbie users tend to try out multiple tools when using BOTS, rather than concentrating on a single platform.

III. 2024 Memecoin Annual Consumption TOP 10 Address Analysis
1. 5 Addresses with Fees Exceeding Ten Million Dollars, with the Highest Spending Reaching 133 Million Dollars
In the 2024 Memecoin transactions, the total fees of the Top 10 user addresses show a high level of consumption concentration, with 5 addresses having total fees exceeding 10 million dollars:
· MfDuWe: 133 million dollars (Fee Rate 0.3%, Total Transaction Amount 448.55 billion dollars).
· kpqUj8: 19.86 million dollars.
· YubQzu: 18.2 million dollars.
· HBGdum: 11.9 million dollars.
· 7vi5dy: 11.89 million dollars.

2. Comparison of Highest and Lowest Fee Users
· The address with the highest fee, MfDuWe, demonstrates a large transaction volume and expenditure, with its fee representing 0.3% of the total transaction amount.
· In contrast, the fee rates of addresses 13g21m and 89VB5U are only 0.005%, the lowest level.
This data clearly reflects the consumption difference among different users in the Memecoin market, as well as the significant contribution of top users to the overall fee revenue.
3. Total Fee Amount from Top 10 Addresses on Platforms such as Raydium, Jito, Pump.fun
The Top 10 user addresses on the Raydium platform show a high fee contribution, with each address's annual fee spending exceeding $10 million. These users almost entirely concentrate all fee spending on the Raydium platform. Details of the Top 10 addresses:

For Jito, the fee amounts from the Top 10 addresses range from $1.2 million to $6.2 million. Details of the Top 10 addresses:

For Pump.fun, the fee amounts from the Top 10 addresses range from $500,000 to $2.4 million. Details of the Top 10 addresses:
4. Total Fee Details of Various Bot Fee Top 10

4. If you need to check your personal 2024 Memecoin spending statement, please refer to:
https://report.tesa.top/
You may also like

What Is an XRP Wallet? The Best Wallets to Store XRP (2026 Updated)
An XRP wallet lets you safely store, send, and receive XRP on the XRP Ledger. Learn what wallets support XRP and discover the best XRP wallets for beginners and long-term holders in 2026.

What are the Top AI Crypto Coins? Render vs. Akash: 5 Gems Solving the 2026 GPU Crisis
What are the best AI crypto coins for the 2026 cycle? Beyond the hype, we analyze top tokens like RNDR, AKT, and FET that provide real-world solutions to the global GPU shortage and the rise of autonomous agents.

What Is a Token in AI? What Is an AI Token + 3 Gems You Can't Miss in 2026
The era of AI hype has transitioned into an era of utility. As we move through Q2 2026, the market is no longer rewarding "narrative-only" projects. At WEEX Research, we are seeing a massive capital rotation into Decentralized Compute (DePIN) and Autonomous Agent coordination layers. This guide analyzes which AI tokens are capturing institutional liquidity and how to spot high-conviction setups in a maturing market.

Consumer-grade Crypto Global Survey: Users, Revenue, and Track Distribution

Prediction Markets Under Bias

Stolen: $290 million, Three Parties Refusing to Acknowledge, Who Should Foot the Bill for the KelpDAO Incident Resolution?

ASTEROID Pumped 10,000x in Three Days, Is Meme Season Back on Ethereum?

ChainCatcher Hong Kong Themed Forum Highlights: Decoding the Growth Engine Under the Integration of Crypto Assets and Smart Economy

Why can this institution still grow by 150% when the scale of leading crypto VCs has shrunk significantly?

Anthropic's $1 trillion, compared to DeepSeek's $100 billion

Geopolitical Risk Persists, Is Bitcoin Becoming a Key Barometer?

Annualized 11.5%, Wall Street Buzzing: Is MicroStrategy's STRC Bitcoin's Savior or Destroyer?

An Obscure Open Source AI Tool Alerted on Kelp DAO's $292 million Bug 12 Days Ago

Mixin has launched USTD-margined perpetual contracts, bringing derivative trading into the chat scene.
The privacy-focused crypto wallet Mixin announced today the launch of its U-based perpetual contract (a derivative priced in USDT). Unlike traditional exchanges, Mixin has taken a new approach by "liberating" derivative trading from isolated matching engines and embedding it into the instant messaging environment.
Users can directly open positions within the app with leverage of up to 200x, while sharing positions, discussing strategies, and copy trading within private communities. Trading, social interaction, and asset management are integrated into the same interface.
Based on its non-custodial architecture, Mixin has eliminated friction from the traditional onboarding process, allowing users to participate in perpetual contract trading without identity verification.
The trading process has been streamlined into five steps:
· Choose the trading asset
· Select long or short
· Input position size and leverage
· Confirm order details
· Confirm and open the position
The interface provides real-time visualization of price, position, and profit and loss (PnL), allowing users to complete trades without switching between multiple modules.
Mixin has directly integrated social features into the derivative trading environment. Users can create private trading communities and interact around real-time positions:
· End-to-end encrypted private groups supporting up to 1024 members
· End-to-end encrypted voice communication
· One-click position sharing
· One-click trade copying
On the execution side, Mixin aggregates liquidity from multiple sources and accesses decentralized protocol and external market liquidity through a unified trading interface.
By combining social interaction with trade execution, Mixin enables users to collaborate, share, and execute trading strategies instantly within the same environment.
Mixin has also introduced a referral incentive system based on trading behavior:
· Users can join with an invite code
· Up to 60% of trading fees as referral rewards
· Incentive mechanism designed for long-term, sustainable earnings
This model aims to drive user-driven network expansion and organic growth.
Mixin's derivative transactions are built on top of its existing self-custody wallet infrastructure, with core features including:
· Separation of transaction account and asset storage
· User full control over assets
· Platform does not custody user funds
· Built-in privacy mechanisms to reduce data exposure
The system aims to strike a balance between transaction efficiency, asset security, and privacy protection.
Against the background of perpetual contracts becoming a mainstream trading tool, Mixin is exploring a different development direction by lowering barriers, enhancing social and privacy attributes.
The platform does not only view transactions as execution actions but positions them as a networked activity: transactions have social attributes, strategies can be shared, and relationships between individuals also become part of the financial system.
Mixin's design is based on a user-initiated, user-controlled model. The platform neither custodies assets nor executes transactions on behalf of users.
This model aligns with a statement issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on April 13, 2026, titled "Staff Statement on Whether Partial User Interface Used in Preparing Cryptocurrency Securities Transactions May Require Broker-Dealer Registration."
The statement indicates that, under the premise where transactions are entirely initiated and controlled by users, non-custodial service providers that offer neutral interfaces may not need to register as broker-dealers or exchanges.
Mixin is a decentralized, self-custodial privacy wallet designed to provide secure and efficient digital asset management services.
Its core capabilities include:
· Aggregation: integrating multi-chain assets and routing between different transaction paths to simplify user operations
· High liquidity access: connecting to various liquidity sources, including decentralized protocols and external markets
· Decentralization: achieving full user control over assets without relying on custodial intermediaries
· Privacy protection: safeguarding assets and data through MPC, CryptoNote, and end-to-end encrypted communication
Mixin has been in operation for over 8 years, supporting over 40 blockchains and more than 10,000 assets, with a global user base exceeding 10 million and an on-chain self-custodied asset scale of over $1 billion.

$600 million stolen in 20 days, ushering in the era of AI hackers in the crypto world

Vitalik's 2026 Hong Kong Web3 Summit Speech: Ethereum's Ultimate Vision as the "World Computer" and Future Roadmap

On the same day Aave introduced rsETH, why did Spark decide to exit?

Full Post-Mortem of the KelpDAO Incident: Why Did Aave, Which Was Not Compromised, End Up in Crisis Situation?
What Is an XRP Wallet? The Best Wallets to Store XRP (2026 Updated)
An XRP wallet lets you safely store, send, and receive XRP on the XRP Ledger. Learn what wallets support XRP and discover the best XRP wallets for beginners and long-term holders in 2026.
What are the Top AI Crypto Coins? Render vs. Akash: 5 Gems Solving the 2026 GPU Crisis
What are the best AI crypto coins for the 2026 cycle? Beyond the hype, we analyze top tokens like RNDR, AKT, and FET that provide real-world solutions to the global GPU shortage and the rise of autonomous agents.
What Is a Token in AI? What Is an AI Token + 3 Gems You Can't Miss in 2026
The era of AI hype has transitioned into an era of utility. As we move through Q2 2026, the market is no longer rewarding "narrative-only" projects. At WEEX Research, we are seeing a massive capital rotation into Decentralized Compute (DePIN) and Autonomous Agent coordination layers. This guide analyzes which AI tokens are capturing institutional liquidity and how to spot high-conviction setups in a maturing market.

